All case studies
Food Production

Plant operators move from −22 to ~0 — and lost-time injuries follow.

HQ scored +31 while plant operators sat at −22 — a textbook detachment of management from the front line. “Voice of the line” loops, supervisor upskilling and predictable rostering closed the gap.

Food production line
At a glance
Company
Multi-site food manufacturer
Size
4,500 FTE
Operators eNPS
−22 → ~0
Timeframe
18 months

The challenge

A local production group consisting of food processing plants and headquarters, employing 4,500 FTEs, initially compared poorly to manufacturing eNPS benchmarks sitting around +15 to +18 in recent years. Management and support services seemed detached from the front line — and safety incidents and unplanned downtime were higher at the lowest-eNPS plants.

Baseline diagnostics

Site-level semi-annual pulse scored the group at +4 overall — masking a sharp split between white-collar HQ and blue-collar plant floor.

HQ Functions
+31
Maintenance & Quality
−5
Plant Operators & Packers
−22

Voice of employees

Frontline comments were sharp, repeated and uncomfortable:

Old equipment and safety concerns.
No time for breaks.
Shift swaps hard with no hand-over.
Nobody listens from white collars.

Interventions

  1. 01

    “Voice of the line” loops

    Shift leaders ran monthly stand-ups where operators prioritized three improvement ideas — leadership had to commit to two per month per line. This triggered safety and ergonomics sprints with quick wins: better lighting, micro-breaks, automation of repetitive tasks.

  2. 02

    Supervisor upskilling

    Recognized supervisors received formal people-management training and coaching from internal coaches — not just technical upskilling.

  3. 03

    Predictable rostering

    Management developed a transparent 4-week schedule with high visibility and transparent shift bidding for shift workers.

Outcomes

After 18 months, operators' eNPS moved from −22 to almost zero and operational KPIs followed — scrap and rework dropped most in the plants with the highest eNPS gains.

Plant operators eNPS
−22 → ~0
Maintenance & quality
−5 → +11
Lost-time injury frequency
Measurably down
Scrap & rework
Reduced
Source

Dr. Norbert Hölzl, “Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS): Logic and Evolution of this Ratio, current Benchmarks compared to iBDP, and selected Industry Case Studies”, Leadbacker, 2025. Pages 12–13. Composite, anonymized case based on patterns observed across Leadbacker client deployments.
Image: Unsplash.